Thursday, 10 October 2013

Perscriptivism and Descriptivism

Prescriptivism

 

What is it?

The attitude or belief that one variety of a language is superior to others and should be promoted as such. You could say prescriptivism is characterised by a concern for "good," "proper," or "correct" usage.
Writers or communicators who wish to use words clearly, powerfully, or effectively often use prescriptive rules, believing that these may make their communications more widely understood.
The rules are based on normal usage, and they determine the way things such as spelling and grammar should be. Examples of prescriptive rules include:
  • Don’t end a sentence with a preposition
  • Don’t split infinitives
  • Don’t use the passive voice
  • Don’t use the pronoun ‘I’ in object position

 

Who supports it? 

  • Geoffrey Pullum

  • Lynne Truss
  • Shadyah A. N. Cole
  • Robert Lowth  

 

 

Descriptivism

 

What is it?
Descriptivism is a non-judgmental approach to language that focuses on how it is written and spoken. The idea behind descriptive linguistics is that a language is defined by what people do with it. In other words, you begin by studying and listening to native speakers. Then, when you notice patterns in the ways that they communicate, you can record those patterns as guesses about the principles of a language. If you rarely observe someone breaking those patterns, then your guess is more likely to be an accurate representation of the language. Those guesses are called hypotheses, and when they are well-supported by evidence, they can be accepted as correctness conditions for a language. For example, a correctness condition about Standard English is the notion of a Subject-Verb-Object (SVO) word order.

 

Who supports it? 

  • Merriam-Webster
  • Alexandra D'arcy
  • Steven Pinker 
  • Noam Chomsky

 
In more detail - 
  • Robert Lowth (1710-1787) was a strong prescriptivist. What he decided was “right” was based largely on his study of Latin. For example, it was Lowth who gave us the rule that sentences should not end with a preposition.  
  • Steven Pinker - Descriptivists, according to this scheme, believe that norms of correctness are arbitrary shibboleths of the ruling class, designed to keep the masses in their place. Language is an organic product of human creativity, and the people should be given the freedom to write however they please.

Friday, 4 October 2013

Rastamouse Controversy

Rastamouse kids TV show sparks racism row

With its singalong rhymes and upbeat tales, Rastamouse is like many other children’s TV shows – except this one has sparked a bitter row about racism.
Controversial Rastamouse (Pic: BBC)
Controversial Rastamouse (Pic: BBC)
With its singalong rhymes and upbeat tales, Rastamouse is like many other children’s TV shows – except this one has sparked a bitter row about racism.

The patois-speaking puppet, who fights crime and spreads love and respect, has been a huge hit with the BBC’s younger viewers since the show hit screens at the end of last month.

He has dreadlocks, a Rasta Tam (woolly hat), rides a skateboard and uses words like “irie” (happy) and “wagwan” (what’s going on?).

His mission is to “make a bad ting good”. And the stories feature his all-rodent reggae band, Da Easy Crew, who hang out at the Nuff Song recording studio in Mouseland.

Celebrity fans include Lily Allen, Dizzee Rascal, Adrian Chiles, Radio One DJ Rob Da Bank and actress Tamzin Outhwaite. But the series has also provoked hundreds of complaints – some parents fear it is racist and encourages the use of slang.


One concerned mother on the Mumsnet forum said: “I’m most worried about her saying words like ‘Rasta’... My child is white and I feel if she was to say this to another child who was not that it would be seen as her insulting the other child.”

And a parent on Bumpandbaby.com said: “Just watched a couple videos... I think it is racist.”

One of those unhappy with the show is Levi Roots, the man behind the Reggae Reggae sauce brand.

Levi told the Mirror: “I was asked to do the voice of the mouse, but I said no. I am a Rastafarian and I wouldn’t want to portray a Rastafarian as a mouse. For me it is about integrity.
“I’d never portray a Rasta as a pig or a mouse as I don’t think the values of being a Rasta are served by that. If it was a lion that would be very different, a lion is strong symbol in Rastafarianism.

“Personally, I do not support this representation of us. But we do need representation on TV and as this is the first it should be given a chance. People need to decide whether it is right or wrong for themselves. I have seven children and I would most certainly not want them to watch this show.”

Rastafarian poet Benjamin Zephaniah is less critical. He said: “It’s not the greatest representation of the community, and the accents are not very accurate – probably because people wouldn’t understand a real one. But it’s the first, so of course it is going to attract criticism.

“The fact that he’s a mouse isn’t great. If you asked the community 99% would want a lion, but so would English football fans.
“On the whole, I’d rather have Rastamouse than not.”

But psychologist Delroy Constantine-Simms has slated the show, saying: “Rastamouse is no better than the new sambo – golliwog in drag. No other ethnic group in Britain would allow their religion to be represented by a rodent. Can you imagine a Jewish person writing Jewie the Crime Fighting Pig? Or a follower of the Hindu faith endorsing Hindi the Crime Fighting Cow?
“Or a book from a Muslim writer titled Jihad Jane? It just would not happen.”

The row has even got as far the Voice newspaper, which aims to serve the black community. Its entertainment editor Davina Hamilton said: “We should applaud Rastamouse – whose mission of ‘making a bad ting good’ is wholly positive – as a first for children’s programming. And we should use it as an opportunity to encourage broadcasters to create other programmes and dramas that reflect elements of black culture.”

According to the BBC, six viewers have complained that Rastamouse stereotypes black people, while another 95 have complained about the language in the show.

Radio One DJ Reggie Yates, who is the voice of Rastamouse, has defended the show. He said: “When I was a kid there were never any cartoons that felt relevant.
 “Rastamouse is an amazing opportunity for me to be involved in a show that my nieces and nephews watch and think is really cool.
 “There are a million and one children’s television programmes where all of the characters are either racially ambiguous or very European – nobody bats an eyelid about those shows.
“But the minute you do something different, naturally, it earns attention. That’s not a bad thing, but it would be nice to get to a point where people just say: ‘Oh great, there’s another show that represents a different part of our community’.”

Rastamouse’s love of cheese has also sparked controversy. Some adult viewers have claimed on Twitter that it is code for marijuana. But creators Genevieve Webster and Michael De Souza insist Rastamouse does not endorse drugs. Genevieve added: “There is no innuendo intended.”

Despite the controversy, Rastamouse is set to go global. The Rastamouse Company has licensed the 52 episodes to broadcasters in Poland, Australia, Canada and Israel with a range of merchandise to follow.
Rastamouse has also signed a deal with EMI to release an album of reggae tracks. He has a debut single out, Ice Popp, and a Facebook group: Let’s get Rastamouse in the Charts.
He may not be a lion, but he is already a roaring success.

Commentary:

How is the language issue represented? 

The language in this piece is represented to show that some people may find it offensive. This is shown when it says 'One concerned mother on the Mumsnet forum said: “I’m most worried about her saying words like ‘Rasta’... My child is white and I feel if she was to say this to another child who was not that it would be seen as her insulting the other child.”'. This is evidence to show how the language represented and that it can have negative connotations. Also if you look at the article there isn't much of a balanced argument from a parents point of view as there are only quotes from parents against the programme which suggests that then writer himself may only be against the programme aswell.
 
 

How does the author represent him/herself and others?

The author uses household celebrity quotes to portray his points on the programme and get different opinions on the matter. To start with the author represents programme to seem ok and quite normal as he writes 'With its singalong rhymes and upbeat tales, Rastamouse is like many other children’s TV shows' this quite claerly shows that it is positive. However as the sentence and the article itself goes on he starts to portray a more negative image of the programme; for example he writes 'except this one has sparked a bitter row about racism.'.


How does the author shape the reader's response (audience positioning)?

There is little interaction between the author and the audience as the article is mainly made up of quotes to present the argument rather than just the author writing his own words. Also showing quotes from the show in speech marks suggest that it is wrong to be using this kind of lexis for example when it says 'uses words like “irie” (happy) and “wagwan” (what’s going on?).' The author tries to shape the reader's response by presenting both sides of the argument throught the celebrity quotes and through writing of his own. Furthermore, you do feel that the author is with the negative side of the agrument because there are only 2 peoples quotes (Reggie Yates and Davina Hamilton) to portray a positive image of the programme.